Triumph Speed Triple Forums banner
1 - 20 of 20 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I just attempted to install one in my S3. The hunk of shit was so warped, it would not fit. What is that other brand? BMC, BMI or something? I'll try that one...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
APtech77 said:
:repost: :horse:
If the topic was something you had no interest in, why click on it and leave a dumbassed reply? The last time I checked, there was no rule saying you HAD to read a post.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,665 Posts
You can get the BMC from several sources. Just make sure the source actually has it in stock BEFORE you order. Some places do not carry our filter in stock, and it can take weeks to arrive.
The only place I have seen the DNA filter is Ebay.

Other than color and price, I don't know if there is much of a difference in the BMC and DNA. The K&N has the pleats running a different way than the others.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,665 Posts
Dfib said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the BMC filter flowed slightly better, correct?
Beats me.
My slack a$$ never put it on the flowbench.
I run the BMC only because it came out first.
I MAY try testing a filter when CB is here ---- IF we have time to test it by itself.

I would like to test the throttle body and intake mods as well. But it may not happen.

Feel free to test it on a dyno or track (road or 1/4 mile) Dfib, I would love to see the results. :)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8,095 Posts
Let me ask this......So, if I ever get these BF pipes, would I be a fool not changing out my stock airfilter to a better flowing filter such as the K&N or BMC....? Is it necessary?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,665 Posts
APtech77 said:
Let me ask this......So, if I ever get these BF pipes, would I be a fool not changing out my stock airfilter to a better flowing filter such as the K&N or BMC....? Is it necessary?
No.

Until the stock filter becomes the restriction, no power will be gained. And even then, only at the very top of the rpm range. The stock paper filter DOES filter better than the after-market oiled gauze filters.

Until someone tests the filters back to back - with tuning - I will not recommend an airfilter as a performance increase. It likely is, but I can't prove it, so it is a non-issue. And as you do more mods to increase power (with tuning) you will need more airflow - but stock may see no increase at all.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,843 Posts
Devious2xs said:
...

I would like to test the throttle body and intake mods as well. But it may not happen.

Feel free to test it on a dyno or track (road or 1/4 mile) Dfib, I would love to see the results. :)
Devi, can you point me at a thread that exemplifies what you've done to your TB and intake?

Thanks... ;D :afro:
 

· Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
Devious2xs said:
Until the stock filter becomes the restriction, no power will be gained. And even then, only at the very top of the rpm range.
Ahhhhhh....then I may not need to change the filter at all. I have TORS and a TuneBoy tune. The TuneBou tune seems to be a little rich where I ride most, which is under 6K RsPM. The reason I was changing the filter was to lean it out a touch with a little extra air flow...BUT if that extra flow is only at the higher RPM range....I don't need to spend the money. Or is the air flow better all around and the power gain is only at higher RsPM??
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,665 Posts
I noticed that when I ran the bike with the 20088tune_dyno39 map, with the header work, it wanted more fuel at high rpm with the BMC and intake work. You will likely never notice a difference with or without 2% more or less fuel on the top end.

So NO, you do not NEED a new tune.
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top