[Guest]

Not for long, POS :jerkit: ;D

 

[Devious2xs]

You gone Quackers?

I test ride Ducs every chance I get. I still don't like the Monster, and don't know why. I had a love-hate relationship with my 900ss.

 

[cheapbastard]

so what was yer impressions bitch? Like it, hate it, suks ass, what? :horse: ;D

 

[Guest]

I got on it with an open mind but I was not impressed at all. Vibrates like a Harley and the power is hard to find, or should I say in a completely different place than speedy, like in the engine. ahaha

 

[cheapbastard]

the power is hard to find, or should I say in a completely different place than speedy, like in the engine. ahaha

;D maybe someone 'ripped the lungs out if it.' ;D

 

[kuhlka]

I test rode one the other day and it wasn't bad. The steering was a lot sharper, brakes were instant-on and way touchy, and the power was definitely different but no less than an S3. Would I trade my 955i for it? No. That test ride clinched the 1098 decision.

 

[Bichomalo]

Pure-Triumph in Ft. Lauderdale is now a Duc. Dealer!!!!! along with triumphs :gtfo: so there you go

 

[kuhlka]

So limey, does the S3 smoke quack? Or was the S4Rs an alright ride? I didn't really have a good/bad opinion of it other than it was 'different' in many ways than my Speed Triple.

 

[Guest]

I didn't spend long on it, but if it was a test ride I'd still be looking.

 

[BillT]

I like the Monster. It was on my short list when I bought Speedy. More power, more usable power, better 'street' feel, 1/3 less cost - that's what sold me on the Triumph.

I know people who are sold on Ducati, but it goes down to, "do you prefer twins or multiples?" I don't like the Aprilia or KTM as much as the Triumph for the same reason - too 'twinny'