Joined
·
20 Posts
Hello.
Please forgive my ignorance in this isuse, I just got my Tuneboy a few days ago, and the last bike I tuned was carbuerated, so I'm new to this stuff.
I have an 07 S3 with the Arrow 3-in-1 from the dealer. They downloaded a tune into it when I purchased the bike from them. According to the TuneEdit, it was tune 20131, "1050cc Speed Triple with Arrow exhaust with secondary air injection". I didn't think Triumph would use a Tuneboy tune... So is the Tunedit software incorrectly identifying the tune, or is that tune the same tune that Triumph would use with that pipe?
I have recently replaced the stock air filter with a K&N filter, and blocked off the SAI air intake ports (haven't gone through the trouble of removing it and blocking off the reed valves, I may one day).
I have since loaded tune 20132, "1050cc Speed Triple with Arrow exhaust without secondary air injection".
I have a rough idle, and I didn't know about the ISVC thing, so I think after I make it out to the garage today and adjust it, it may fix that problem.
But, what I'm really wondering about is this: How much more performance am I going to gain by going through the trouble (and expense) of using a dyno with my bike, over using the Tuneboy tune that I am? Since my bike pretty much matches that tune description perfectly, is it an optimal tune, derrived from a dyno, or is it some mathematical guesswork done by Wayne to be 'good enough' as a starting point to really start tuning?
Also, I'm mainly interested in getting lower end grunt than I am top speed out of the S3. What should I be looking for, if I start to play with the datalogger and try to adjust things in that regard?
Thanks alot. Sorry I'm new to this. I've read through a lot of the how-to posts for the Tuneboy, but I didn't see all of my questions answered.
Thanks,
H.
Please forgive my ignorance in this isuse, I just got my Tuneboy a few days ago, and the last bike I tuned was carbuerated, so I'm new to this stuff.
I have an 07 S3 with the Arrow 3-in-1 from the dealer. They downloaded a tune into it when I purchased the bike from them. According to the TuneEdit, it was tune 20131, "1050cc Speed Triple with Arrow exhaust with secondary air injection". I didn't think Triumph would use a Tuneboy tune... So is the Tunedit software incorrectly identifying the tune, or is that tune the same tune that Triumph would use with that pipe?
I have recently replaced the stock air filter with a K&N filter, and blocked off the SAI air intake ports (haven't gone through the trouble of removing it and blocking off the reed valves, I may one day).
I have since loaded tune 20132, "1050cc Speed Triple with Arrow exhaust without secondary air injection".
I have a rough idle, and I didn't know about the ISVC thing, so I think after I make it out to the garage today and adjust it, it may fix that problem.
But, what I'm really wondering about is this: How much more performance am I going to gain by going through the trouble (and expense) of using a dyno with my bike, over using the Tuneboy tune that I am? Since my bike pretty much matches that tune description perfectly, is it an optimal tune, derrived from a dyno, or is it some mathematical guesswork done by Wayne to be 'good enough' as a starting point to really start tuning?
Also, I'm mainly interested in getting lower end grunt than I am top speed out of the S3. What should I be looking for, if I start to play with the datalogger and try to adjust things in that regard?
Thanks alot. Sorry I'm new to this. I've read through a lot of the how-to posts for the Tuneboy, but I didn't see all of my questions answered.
Thanks,
H.